Home
http://www.virbac.fr/ http://www.boehringer-ingelheim.com/ http://www.novartis.com/ http://www.animalhealth.bayerhealthcare.com/
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  WELCOME  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  Home  
  Login / Newsletter  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  CONTACTS  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  Classifieds  
  New Products  
  VetCompanies  
  VetSchools  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  PROFESSION  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  Edutainment  
  VetAgenda  
  Presentations  
  Posters  
  ESAVS  
  Specialisation  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  INSIGHT  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  Congress News  
  Picture Galleries  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  PRODUCTS  
vetcontact
Vetrinär
Tiermedizin
  Bayer  
  Boehringer Ing.  
  Novartis  
  Virbac

 
  Simply book for less...  
    

Bovine    Equine    Small Animal Practice    Swine Practice    Articles    Vetjournal    
deutsch english español polski francais
Home / WELCOME / Archiv / Small Animal Practice /     
 
The influence of bimatoprost and unoprostone isopropyl on the intraocular pressure of cats
An interesting and important question: do these eye medications have effects on the paramaters of intraocular pressure (IOP), pupillary diameter (PD), blepharospasm score, conjunctival injection score, and aqueous humor flare score on the eyes of healthy cats?

Either 0.03% bimatoprost solution is applied once daily or 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution is applied twice daily topically to the eyes of normal cats.

The aforementioned parameters were evaluated daily in each of 12 cats throughout the entirety of the study.
During an initial 10-day treatment phase a single eye of six of the cats was treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution while a single eye of the remaining six cats was treated with buffered saline solution (BSS) once daily.

During a second 10-day treatment phase a single eye of six of the cats was treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution while a single eye of the remaining six cats was treated with BSS twice daily.
Contralateral eyes of all cats remained untreated at all time points.

Results: Blepharospasm score, conjunctival injection score, and aqueous humor flare score never rose from a value of 0, for any eye of any cat during the study.
The mean ± SD of IOP for eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution and BSS were 16.55 ± 3.06 mmHg and 18.02 ± 3.52 mmHg, respectively.
The mean ± of PD for eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution and BSS were 5.7 ± 1.57 mm and 6.39 ± 1.78 mm, respectively.
The mean ± SD of IOP for eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution and BSS were 15.7 ± 2.91 mmHg and 17.2 ± 2.9 mmHg, respectively. The mean ± SD of PD for eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution and BSS were 5.8 ± 1.43 mm and 6.9 ± 1.37 mm, respectively.

There was no significant difference (P 0.05) in IOP or PD between eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution vs. eyes treated with BSS.

Similarly, there was no significant difference (P 0.05) in IOP or PD between eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution vs. eyes treated with BSS.

Conclusion: Neither once daily topical administration of 0.03% bimatoprost solution nor twice daily topical administration of 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution significantly affect the IOP of normal cats.
Both 0.03% bimatoprost solution and 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution induced no significant ocular side effects in normal cats when dosed over a 10-day treatment period.


Source: Bartoe, Joshua T., Davidson, Harriet J., Horton, Mary T., Jung, Yoonsung & Brightman, Alan H. (2005): The effects of bimatoprost and unoprostone isopropyl on the intraocular pressure of normal cats. In: Veterinary Ophthalmology 8 (4), 247-252.





Tell a friend   |   Print version   |   Send this article

SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE

Staining hair samples with a modified Wright-Giemsa stain to diagnose feline dermatophytosismembers
Direct examination of the hair is a simple diagnostic test for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis; training is needed to use this test. This study tried to evaluate whether use of modified Wright–Giemsa blue stain and/or photographic images of infected and uninfected hairs improved the user`s ability to identify infected or uninfected hairs. Ten cats with, and 10 cats without, dermatophytosis due to Microsporum canis (n = 20) were enrolled.

  • Oral extended release hydrocodone as analgesia after TPLOmembers
  • 25OH vitamin D3 serum concentration in dogs with acute polyradiculoneuritismembers
  • Type 1 immune mediated polyarthritis in dogs and temporal relationship to vaccination members
  • Phosphorus and protein supply before diagnosis of chronic kidney disease members
  • Bilateral retinoschisis in a Labrador retrievermembers
  • Water requirements of canine athletes during exercise over daysmembers
  • Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death in Doberman Pinschers with DCMmembers
  • D-dimer concentration after soft tissue and orthopedic surgery members
  • Canine oral mucosa as autograft in unresponsive keratoconjunctivitis siccamembers
  • Computed tomographic findings in dogs infected with Crenosoma vulpismembers
  • Predicting histopathological classification of canine mammary carcinomas via sonographymembers
  • The expression of Vitamin D receptors in dogsmembers


  • [ Home ] [ About ] [ Contact / Request ][ Disclaimer ]

    Copyright © 2001-2016 VetContact GmbH
    All rights reserved