|Two different, inactivated, aluminium salt adsorbed vaccines, one containing a R. equi strain (serotype 1, 10(9) CFU/ml and equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2) (1.5 x 10(7) PFU/ml) and another containing R. equi only were used on three studfarms to determine whether the disease can be prevented by vaccination of both pregnant mares and their foals.
Pregnant mares received two 3 ml doses of vaccine intramuscularly 6 and 2 weeks before parturition and their foals were vaccinated on two or three occasions at 3, 5 or 7 weeks of age.
The efficacy of the vaccines was evaluated on the basis of the clinical signs, serological response (indirect haemagglutination and virus neutralisation tests) and culture of R. equi from sick or dead foals.
On studs A and B where the bivalent vaccine was used, 24 and 14 foals were born respectively to the vaccinated mares but no clinical case or death occurred due to R. equi pneumonia, while out of the 10 nonvaccinated control foals (stud B) two succumbed to R. equi pneumonia and 4 other foals had to be treated with antibiotics because of fever, coughing and dyspnea.
In stud C, where the vaccine containing R. equi strain alone was used, all 15 vaccinated foals remained healthy but one of the 11 control foals died of suppurative R. equi pneumonia and one foal had to be treated due to R. equi pneumonia.
R. equi strains (serotype 1) were isolated from the lungs of all dead foals.
The serological response was very weak to both R. equi and the EHV-2 strain. Antibody titres in the colostrum of the vaccinated mares against R. equi (in studs A and B, geometric mean 3.79 +/- 1.63 and 4.14 +/- 1.46, respectively) were practically not higher than titres in the controls (in stud B geometric mean 2.12 +/- 1.96).
More antibody was present in the colostrum samples against EHV-2 (geometric mean 6.1 + 1.4 compared to 2.5 +/- 1.2).
In all foals antibody levels were hardly detectable against both R. equi and EHV-2 until five weeks of age.
From the fifth week, antibody levels gradually increased and by the ninth week their reached a titre of 5.5 +/- 1.8 (2.7 +/- 1.2 in the control foals) against R. equi and 5.2 +/- 1.4 against EHV-2.
The favorable clinical results and the low antibody titres in the sera of the vaccinated foals during the first week of life suggest that protection probably was due to repeated vaccination of young foals rather than to vaccination of mares.
Source: Varga J, Fodor L, Rusvai M, Soos I, Makrai L. (1997): Prevention of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia of foals using two different inactivated vaccines. In: Vet Microbiol. 1997 Jun 16;56(3-4):205-12.
Tell a friend
Send this article
Limbal squamous cell carcinoma in a Rocky Mountain Horse and geneticsSubconjunctival bupivacaine, lidocaine, and mepivacaine and the corneal sensitivity in horsesClodronate in horses with lamenessValacyclovir in horses with equine multinodular pulmonary fibrosisRadiculopathy associated with forelimb lameness in horsesBiological variations of routine blood parameters in horsesPrognosis for horses with deep digital flexor tendon injury after penetrating woundPossible maternal effect for the pace trait of horsesFlecainide on induced atrial fibrillation in horsesSonographic technique to identify manica flexoria tears in horsesNovel prototype dynamic laryngoplasty system on arytenoid abductionLipid peroxidation biomarkers in equine neuroaxonal dystrophy